Relatives' Heartache Regarding Coastal Degradation Threatening Coastal Norfolk Burial Sites
Loved ones of people buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.
A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards
The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.
A recent report on the situation details a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.
“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”
Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.
Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles
One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.
“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”
“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”
A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril
Along the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.
“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”
In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”
Seeking Answers and Certainty
An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.
Some want additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.
“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”
A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”
It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”
“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right solutions for each village.”
The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.